Mini Molecular Rotor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


PINWHEEL. A molecule of hexa-tert-butyl decacyclene resembles a minirotor, 1.5 nanometers in diameter. In this scanning tunneling microscope image, the molecule is spinning so fast that the individual blades have blurred and it looks like a doughnut, or torus.

IBM scientists at the Zurich Research Laboratory report on a pinwheel smaller than a pin's head in the journal Science. The structure is a single molecule of hexa-tert-butyl decacyclene (HB-DC): six bulky t-butyl blades fan out from a central benzene ring. Steric interactions between the hydrogen atoms on the blade's tips make them twist like those on a propeller.

James K. Gimzewski and colleagues deposited enough HB-DC molecules on a clean copper surface to nearly cover it, but not quite. Then they studied them using a scanning tunneling microscope in an ultrahigh vacuum.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some HB-DC molecules bonded together into a tight crystal lattice, but where there were nanoscopic voids, the molecules had a bit more freedom. Here the group observed individual atoms that, instead of having the classic six-lobed shape, resembled doughnuts. Their conclusion: these molecules were spinning at speeds too fast for the camera to catch--and so the lobes blurred into a single loop. The molecules around them served as a bearing of sorts.

This minirotor is much smaller than many classical micromachines, which measure in the tens of micrometers. It works in a dry state and appears to be wearless, because it weighs a mere 1.33 x 10 -24 kilograms. To make it rotate takes nothing more than a nudge from a scanning tunneling microscope tip.


Image: J.K. GIMZEWSKI and C. JOACHIM, IBM Research Division, Zurich Research Laboratory, Ruschlikon, Switzerland.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe