Mississippi's Triple Temblors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: courtesy of Seth Stein

Second only to California, the New Madrid seismic zone, which extends for 100 miles along the Mississippi river from Missouri to Arkansas, is the most earthquake-prone region in the U.S. (see seismic map right). In 1811 three powerful quakes in a row--measuring approximately 7.5 to 8.3 on the Richter scale--ripped along the fault there, ringing church bells as far away as Boston. Ever since, the question has lingered: will it soon happen again? A report in the April 1999 issue of Science said probably not, but a paper in today's issue takes a different view.

"If you live in the New Madrid area, you may still have an earthquake problem, says Paul Segall at Stanford University. He and co-author Shelley Kenner base much of their concern on a new model, and doubts about the earlier study, which tracked ground movement in the New Madrid area using Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites. The author of that study, geologist Seth Stein of Northwestern University, suggested that the amount of movement they measured was insufficient to create much stress along the fault for thousands of years. But Kenner and Segall don't think it's that clear.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

They point out that, although Stein's GPS data is accurate, his conclusion is based on earthquake-prediction models for the San Andreas fault, a so-called transform fault. The New Madrid crack is an entirely different kind, called an intraplate fault. "As scientists, we don't understand what's happening in the intraplate setting all that well," Kenner says. "What we tried to do in our current Science study is to come up with a model that's a better approximation of the New Madrid seismic zone." That model predicts that another triple temblor could hit the area by the middle of century, if not sooner.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American