Mississippi's Triple Temblors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: courtesy of Seth Stein

Second only to California, the New Madrid seismic zone, which extends for 100 miles along the Mississippi river from Missouri to Arkansas, is the most earthquake-prone region in the U.S. (see seismic map right). In 1811 three powerful quakes in a row--measuring approximately 7.5 to 8.3 on the Richter scale--ripped along the fault there, ringing church bells as far away as Boston. Ever since, the question has lingered: will it soon happen again? A report in the April 1999 issue of Science said probably not, but a paper in today's issue takes a different view.

"If you live in the New Madrid area, you may still have an earthquake problem, says Paul Segall at Stanford University. He and co-author Shelley Kenner base much of their concern on a new model, and doubts about the earlier study, which tracked ground movement in the New Madrid area using Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites. The author of that study, geologist Seth Stein of Northwestern University, suggested that the amount of movement they measured was insufficient to create much stress along the fault for thousands of years. But Kenner and Segall don't think it's that clear.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They point out that, although Stein's GPS data is accurate, his conclusion is based on earthquake-prediction models for the San Andreas fault, a so-called transform fault. The New Madrid crack is an entirely different kind, called an intraplate fault. "As scientists, we don't understand what's happening in the intraplate setting all that well," Kenner says. "What we tried to do in our current Science study is to come up with a model that's a better approximation of the New Madrid seismic zone." That model predicts that another triple temblor could hit the area by the middle of century, if not sooner.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe