New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Moderate Drinkers Less Likely to Die after Heart Attacks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As scientists continue to debate the possible benefits of moderate drinking, researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center have found that it may help some people survive after heart attacks. "Our study does not answer the question whether alcohol is good for you," lead author Kenneth J. Mukamal cautions. "For moderate drinkers these findings are consistent with a lower risk of death from drinking a limited amount of alcohol. But we don't know if people who are nondrinkers would also have a lower risk."

Mukamal and his colleagues, who report the results of their study in today's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, looked at 1,913 people hospitalized after heart attacks in the U.S. between 1989 and 1994. Nearly half, or 47 percent, of the subjects did not drink. Another 36 percent were light drinkers, defined as having fewer than seven drinks a week, and 17 percent were moderate drinkers, who consumed an average of 14 alcoholic beverages a week. The scientists then reevaluated the participants roughly four years later.

As of January 1996, 317 subjects had died. Whereas 17 percent of the nondrinkers had died from cardiovascular complications, only 9 percent of the light drinkers and 7 percent of the moderate drinkers had suffered a similar fate. "While the findings from this and other studies suggest that moderate alcohol drinkers have a lower risk of suffering a heart attack and of dying after a heart attack, people who have heart disease or a family history of the disease should consult their physicians about ways to reduce their risk," Mukamal says. "The balance of risks and benefits from alcohol will be different for every individual."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe