New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Modern Telescopes Illuminate 400-Year-Old Astronomical Mystery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Four hundred years ago this past weekend, skywatchers witnessed the appearance of a new object in the western sky. Later identified as a supernova, the entity was dubbed Kepler's remnant after the legendary astronomer Johannes Kepler, who studied it during its early years. Now astronomers are using space telescopes to better understand our galaxy's most recent supernova.

¿The glow from young remnants, such as Kepler's supernova remnant, comes from several components,¿ explains Ravi Sankrit of Johns Hopkins University. ¿Each component shows up best at different wavelengths.¿ Sankrit and William Blair, also at Hopkins, are thus employing three NASA observatories--the Spitzer Space Telescope, the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory--to study the supernova remains in detail. The combined image (above) reveals a cloud of dust and gas 14 light-years across, which is expanding at a rate of four million miles an hour. Infrared observations highlight the hot pieces of interstellar dust, whereas X-ray data from Chandra garner information on gas within the cloud. Hubble's visible light camera, meanwhile, captures the supernova's advancing shock wave butting up against dense surrounding gas.

Astronomers are still trying to pinpoint the source of Kepler's remnant. Supernova typically result from the demise of one of two types of stars, white dwarfs and massive stars more than eight times the size of our sun. Of the six known Milky Way supernovae, Kepler's remnant remains the only one for which scientists do not yet know the cause. ¿When the analysis is complete,¿ Blair says, ¿we will be able to answer several questions about this enigmatic object.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe