VANISHINGLY SMALL MACHINES like the ones envisioned here could someday serve as tiny mechanical doctors. These miniature devices would roam between the red cells of the bloodstream, seeking out and destroying harmful viruses (shown here as green geometric solids). The working parts of these machines would be built around gears no bigger than a protein molecule.
Nanotechnology is the blanket term used to describe the precision manufacture of materials and structures of molecular dimensions. Many of the goals of nanotechnology were expressed nearly 40 years ago by the renowned physicist Richard P. Feynman. Molecular-scale robots currently exist only in the imaginations of nanotechnologists and the artists who depict their ideas. But some technological visionaries, led by K. Eric Drexler, think that the dream will soon become a reality that will transform everything from health care to food production. (Drexler's ideas are outlined in his book Engines of Creation).
Engineers have developed tiny gears and motors that hint at the promise of making such molecular devices; researchers at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, recently announced the creation of "intelligent" micromachines that incorporate integrated-circuit controllers.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
New tools like scanning tunneling microscopes permit the manipulation of individual atoms. Drexler and other nanovisionaries believe that this invention marks a step toward the manufacture of molecular gears and other components needed for constructing nanometer-scale (billionth of a meter) machines.
Despite such advances, many researchers consider Drexler's goals for molecular nanotechnology to be a pie-in-the-sky fantasy, as described in a recent Scientific American article (see "Waiting for Breakthroughs," by Gary Stix; Scientific American, April 1996). That article has prompted a vehement rebuttal from the Foresight Institute, written by Ralph C. Merkle of Xerox PARC in Palo Alto, Calif.
