Molecular Meshup: Self-Assembling "Cages" Trap Molecules

How do you capture a molecule? It may sound like a rhetorical question, but the answer is simple: You use a very tiny cage, like the molecular traps pictured here.

Michael D. Ward, New York University

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How do you capture a molecule? It may sound like a rhetorical question, but the answer is simple: You use a very tiny cage, like the molecular traps pictured here.

These three-dimensional shapes, called truncated octahedrons, self-assembled out of molecular "tiles" created by researchers at New York University. The geometric regularity of the cages, and the fact that they self-assemble using hydrogen bonds, could help researchers create more such materials in the future.

In order to attain a high enough resolution to reveal the shape of the molecular traps, researchers had to zoom in at the atomic level, using a scanning tunneling microscope. This detailed scan reveals that each trap consists of only 20 ions hydrogen-bonded into a lattice, and has a volume of 2,200 cubic angstroms. Their tiny size means that 20 billion billion traps would fit into the same space taken by average-size raindrop.

But other than the fun of hunting extremely tiny targets, what's the point of a molecular trap? In a prepared statement, team member Mike Ward said, "This makes it possible to separate chemicals based on size or perform reactions inside well-defined cages, which could potentially give you more control over chemical reactivity and reaction products." Caging chemicals could also change their optical or magnetic properties, giving rise to new materials.

—Sophie Bushwick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe