New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Molecules with Antimatter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For decades, researchers have known that the electron and its antiparticle, the positron, can join together to form a short-lived, hydrogenlike atom dubbed positronium. Now scientists at the University of California, Riverside, have managed to get two positronium atoms to stick together to form a molecule—di-positronium. The researchers first collected some 20 million positrons in an electromagnetic trap. They then fired the positrons in an intense nanosecond-long burst onto a microscopic spot on a thin, porous silica film. The positrons diffused into the pores, pulling in electrons and forming roughly 100,000 molecules of di-positronium. Investigating these molecules could open up new studies of antimatter and explain why so little of it exists in the universe. The gamma rays generated when electrons and positrons eventually collide might also be used to develop directed-energy weapons or to help ignite fusion reactions in nuclear power plants.

Make more sense of the matter in the September 13 Nature.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Molecules with Antimatter” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 5 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1107-34b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe