Monarchs Suffer Through a Tough Winter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: MonarchWatch/ORLEY "CHIP" TAYLOR

It's been a bad winter for the monarch butterfly. Although most insects in temperate climates stay put in some form or another throughout coldest months of the year, the tiny monarchs annually migrate to Mexico by the millions. Of all species of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), no other travels so far. Indeed, some of them fly up to 3,000 miles for their winter sojourn south of the border (see map).

But this past season something went very wrong, and a large number died, according to a recent report from the University of Kansas. One possible explanation is a winter storm that hit the mountains of Mexico early in March. "It could conceivably have removed up to one sixth of the monarchs in the overwintering colonies," says Orley Taylor, a professor in the department of systematics and ecology at the University of Kansas, who has been studying monarch butterflies since the early 1990s and directs the MonarchWatch organization.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But there are also unconfirmed reports from both environmental groups and local people that loggers sprayed the trees with pesticides, killing the monarchs so that they could harvest the lumber. "There are reasons for people to spread this rumor, and there are reasons why it could be true," Taylor says. "It is very difficult to sort that out at this time." Either way, he adds that "the very idea that there are rumors about spraying and logging is very disconcerting to a lot of us. We look at this as being a real fight, a real battle for preservation, so that the butterflies will have a wintering safe site."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe