New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Monkey Mating Requires Lots of Brainpower

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As Valentine¿s Day approaches, many men are spending some extra time thinking about their sweethearts. New findings suggest that brainpower plays a more significant role in choosing a mate than previously thought, at least in monkeys. According to research published in the February issue of the Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, brain regions associated with complex, organized neural processes¿in addition to those linked to sexual arousal¿light up when males encounter appealing mates.

Craig Ferris of the University of Massachusetts Medical School and his colleagues used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to analyze the brains of male marmoset monkeys. The creatures were exposed to scents from a variety of females, some close to ovulation (and therefore sexually attractive) and some that had had their ovaries removed and were therefore less desirable. "We were surprised to observe high levels of neural activity in areas of the brain important for decision making, as well as in purely sexual arousal areas, in response to olfactory clues," remarks study co-author Charles T. Snowdon of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Lighting up far more brightly than we expected were areas associated with decision making and memory, emotional processing and reward, and cognitive control."

The authors note that the monkey MRIs showed surprising similarity to studies carried out on humans. Notes Snowdon, "The benefit of the nonhuman primate model is that we can control and know the developmental and social histories of our study subjects, to carry out studies not possible in humans."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe