Monkey See, Monkey Ignore

Primates can delay gratification to earn a bigger prize

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When a person's behavior is out of control, people might say he is “going ape.” It appears, however, that our closest relatives can behave themselves better than we thought. New research in chimpanzees and monkeys could reveal clues about how self-control originated in humans.

Even children know that resisting instant gratification can lead to greater rewards. Past research showed that to cope with such delays kids can distract themselves by playing. Now psychologists Theodore Evans and Michael Beran of Georgia State University find that chimpanzees can also employ diversions to control themselves.

The scientists tested chimps with a candy dispenser that delivered a treat every 30 seconds. As soon as the apes reached for the accrued sweets, no more candy came—so if the chimps exercised restraint, they earned a greater reward. Sometimes the chimpanzees were given toys, such as magazines or toothbrushes. Evans and Beran found that the apes could resist temptation about 50 percent longer when they could amuse themselves with playthings, racking up 17 candies on average with toys and only 11 without toys.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Evans's other work has revealed self-control among more distantly related primates as well. For instance, tufted capuchin monkeys can show enough restraint to use celery stalks and pretzel rods to scrape peanut butter out of a cylinder, rather than devouring the edible sticks immediately.

The evolution of more sophisticated degrees of self-control might have been key to our ancestors’ developing time- and labor-intensive faculties such as tool making, Evans says. Further comparisons between humans and other primates could help us understand when and how our self-control became as complex as it did.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Monkey See, Monkey Ignore” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 6 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1207-8b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe