Monkeys Use Alarm Calls to Tell Predators to Scram  

New research shows that primate calls deter predators in the wild 

Jason G. Goldman (top); Hal Beral Getty Images (bottom)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Anthropologist Dara Adams was following a troop of six saki monkeys in Peru’s Amazon rain forest, when out of nowhere they began shrieking, hooting and barking loudly. Suddenly, sleek and black as night, a small wildcat called a jaguarundi descended the trunk of a Brazil nut tree, leaped to the forest floor and ran off into the jungle.

Many animals use alarm calls to warn others in their species about a predator. But that does not entirely explain what Adams saw—because the monkeys continued calling even after the entire group became aware of the threat. A more tantalizing possibility is that the monkeys were addressing the cat itself, blowing its cover and warning it to call off the hunt.

This idea, which scientists call the “pursuit deterrence hypothesis,” has been proposed in studies of birds, fish and mammals. But the vast majority of studies focus on the calling prey animal, rather than the impacts of those calls on the predators, Adams says. So she and her team from the Ohio State University decided to radio-collar two ocelots, another type of petite cat found in the Peruvian Amazon. While tracking the cats’ movements, Adams and her colleagues used an unobtrusive loudspeaker to broadcast recorded alarm calls from titi and saki monkeys, two species ocelots prey on. They also played other types of social calls made by the monkeys.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The alarm calls proved an effective deterrent, prompting the ocelots to move away from the loudspeaker. When the cats heard the other types of calls, they either stayed still or moved in some random direction—but never as far away as when they heard the alarm ones, the team reported last November in Animal Behaviour. “Our study provides the first experimental evidence to show that wild ambush predators in natural conditions are deterred by prey alarm calls,” Adams says.

Dan Blumstein, a biologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved in the study, agrees that the findings suggest these monkeys’ calls serve to warn off the cats. But he wonders, “Are they moving away out of fear of getting attacked by the monkeys? Or are they moving away because they know the game is up?”

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 320 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Monkey Alarms” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 320 No. 6 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0619-18

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe