New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Monkeys Use Alarm Calls to Tell Predators to Scram  

New research shows that primate calls deter predators in the wild 

Jason G. Goldman (top); Hal Beral Getty Images (bottom)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Anthropologist Dara Adams was following a troop of six saki monkeys in Peru’s Amazon rain forest, when out of nowhere they began shrieking, hooting and barking loudly. Suddenly, sleek and black as night, a small wildcat called a jaguarundi descended the trunk of a Brazil nut tree, leaped to the forest floor and ran off into the jungle.

Many animals use alarm calls to warn others in their species about a predator. But that does not entirely explain what Adams saw—because the monkeys continued calling even after the entire group became aware of the threat. A more tantalizing possibility is that the monkeys were addressing the cat itself, blowing its cover and warning it to call off the hunt.

This idea, which scientists call the “pursuit deterrence hypothesis,” has been proposed in studies of birds, fish and mammals. But the vast majority of studies focus on the calling prey animal, rather than the impacts of those calls on the predators, Adams says. So she and her team from the Ohio State University decided to radio-collar two ocelots, another type of petite cat found in the Peruvian Amazon. While tracking the cats’ movements, Adams and her colleagues used an unobtrusive loudspeaker to broadcast recorded alarm calls from titi and saki monkeys, two species ocelots prey on. They also played other types of social calls made by the monkeys.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The alarm calls proved an effective deterrent, prompting the ocelots to move away from the loudspeaker. When the cats heard the other types of calls, they either stayed still or moved in some random direction—but never as far away as when they heard the alarm ones, the team reported last November in Animal Behaviour. “Our study provides the first experimental evidence to show that wild ambush predators in natural conditions are deterred by prey alarm calls,” Adams says.

Dan Blumstein, a biologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved in the study, agrees that the findings suggest these monkeys’ calls serve to warn off the cats. But he wonders, “Are they moving away out of fear of getting attacked by the monkeys? Or are they moving away because they know the game is up?”

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 320 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Monkey Alarms” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 320 No. 6 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0619-18

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe