New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Moody Blood

Testing for depression

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If only mood rings really worked. With no easy test for mood disorders, doctors must rely on patients’ subjective reports of their emotional states to make a diagnosis. But help may be on the way—researchers have discovered markers of depression and mania in blood, taking a significant step toward developing a blood test for mood.

A team of molecular psychiatrists led by Alexander Niculescu of the Indiana University School of Medicine extracted RNA—genetic material that turns genes on and off—from the blood of people with bipolar disorder. The researchers identified 10 genes that display different patterns of activity during episodes of depression and mania. “We were pleased and surprised to get a blood readout that correlates with symptoms of the illness and things that happen in the brain,” Niculescu says. The changes in genetic activity indicate high and low moods with 60 to 80 percent accuracy.

Five of the genes are involved with myelin, the white matter that insulates neurons and facilitates their communication. Myelin deficits have been associated with schizophrenia and alcoholism, but whether they are a cause or a symptom of these diseases is unknown. Nevertheless, such deficits could serve as a red flag.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“To find particular biomarkers for mental illness is very significant,” says Akira Sawa of Johns Hopkins University, who is searching for similar signposts of schizophrenia.

Broader studies must be done to assess how time, gender and medications may influence gene expression, but Niculescu expects a blood test for mood disorders to be available within about five years. “Having an objective test for a disease state, its severity and especially its response to treatment would be a big step forward,” he says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe