Moody Blood

Testing for depression

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If only mood rings really worked. With no easy test for mood disorders, doctors must rely on patients’ subjective reports of their emotional states to make a diagnosis. But help may be on the way—researchers have discovered markers of depression and mania in blood, taking a significant step toward developing a blood test for mood.

A team of molecular psychiatrists led by Alexander Niculescu of the Indiana University School of Medicine extracted RNA—genetic material that turns genes on and off—from the blood of people with bipolar disorder. The researchers identified 10 genes that display different patterns of activity during episodes of depression and mania. “We were pleased and surprised to get a blood readout that correlates with symptoms of the illness and things that happen in the brain,” Niculescu says. The changes in genetic activity indicate high and low moods with 60 to 80 percent accuracy.

Five of the genes are involved with myelin, the white matter that insulates neurons and facilitates their communication. Myelin deficits have been associated with schizophrenia and alcoholism, but whether they are a cause or a symptom of these diseases is unknown. Nevertheless, such deficits could serve as a red flag.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“To find particular biomarkers for mental illness is very significant,” says Akira Sawa of Johns Hopkins University, who is searching for similar signposts of schizophrenia.

Broader studies must be done to assess how time, gender and medications may influence gene expression, but Niculescu expects a blood test for mood disorders to be available within about five years. “Having an objective test for a disease state, its severity and especially its response to treatment would be a big step forward,” he says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe