More Airports to Use Greener ‘Glide’ Approach to Landing

A growing number of U.S. airports are trying swoop landings rather than staircase descents, a method that saves fuel, cuts emissions and reduces noise

airplane just before landing in the early morning with runway lights in the foreground.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Eleven more U.S. airports plan to adopt a new way of landing planes that reduces both emissions and noise — all by having incoming planes turn off their engines and glide down to the tarmac like a paraglider.

The Federal Aviation Administration announced Monday that planes heading to Orlando, Fla.; Kansas City, Mo.; Omaha, Neb.; Nebraska's Offutt Air Force Base; Reno, Nev.; and six airports in South Florida soon would make idle descents to runways. It's a method called “Optimized Profile Descent,” and more than 60 U.S. airports already have it in place.

Traditionally, airplanes have made “staircase descents,” in which air traffic controllers direct pilots to lower altitudes in several intermediate steps before a complete landing to avoid collision in the busy airspace.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new way of landing — by allowing planes to remain longer in cruise altitude and avoid burning fuel during staircase descents — not only would cut carbon emissions but also would lower noise levels.

Airlines would save 90,000 gallons of fuel on average and reduce emissions by 27,000 tons annually, which is equivalent to the amount of fuel used by 62 Boeing 737 flights between New York and Cleveland — or the annual carbon emissions of more than 1,600 average Americans combined.

“Everybody's at idle for the entire descent, burning the minimum fuel, making the minimum noise and creating the minimum emission,” said John-Paul Clarke, an aerospace engineering and engineering mechanics professor at the University of Texas, Austin. “So it's a win, win, win and a win.”

Such fuel-efficient landing had not been possible in many of the nation’s busiest airports because of safety concerns. Without a robust model that calculates descent speed and altitude of different airplanes with varying size and shape, it was too dangerous to let them glide down to a tarmac.

“Everybody knew from the beginning of time that if I cruise, wait until the last minute and do idle descent, it is going to burn less amount of fuel,” Clarke said. “The problem is that when you have 50 airplanes coming into an airport, doing that is really tough.”

What changed are those very models that Clarke and his colleagues built in the early 2000s. The approach was first applied to Los Angeles International Airport, and it is now used in 64 airports around the country, including those in Atlanta, Denver, Houston, Miami, Seattle, the District of Columbia and Las Vegas, allowing aircraft to draw smooth, continuous arcs while landing.

The difficulty of arranging the busy American airspace, however, makes it harder for more airports to adopt Optimized Profile Descent, Clarke said. Because any given airspace is like “Swiss cheese” with aircraft passing below and above them, adopting this new approach to landing means adjusting and redesigning dozens, if not hundreds, of flight routes.

The change is still happening, albeit slowly.

“We are investing across the entire system to provide passengers with the best travel experience,” said acting FAA Administrator Billy Nolen in a statement. "The era of choppy descents is coming to an end, providing a smoother landing and saving fuel in the process."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe