New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

More Than Government Grants

Entrepreneurial ingenuity focuses on finding money and ideas to advance medical science

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

To lift the burden of infectious diseases in poor nations, Harvard University economist Michael Kremer has advocated a kind of artificial market for vaccines. In Kremer's scheme, a donor would commit to paying a certain sum for the development of a vaccine and would purchase it at a high price per dose. After that, the company would supply the vaccine to poor countries at a low price.

Kremer's approach is one of many that have marshaled unprecedented creativity to chart new paths for medical research. A different attempt is the brainchild of Scott Johnson, a 50-yearold former businessman who is waging a personal battle against multiple sclerosis. His Myelin Repair Foundation, established in 2003, has persuaded five of the field's top university researchers to merge their laboratories and create a more businesslike plan for developing treatments.

Similarly, four leading cancer centers have linked efforts to coordinate clinical trials, share resources and pool their findings on a deadly bone disease: multiple myeloma, a blood cancer that erodes bones and often kills quickly. Leading the project is Kathy Giusti, a pharmaceutical executive who learned that she had multiple myeloma in 1996. A graduate of Harvard Business School, Giusti set up the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, which has raised $60 million for research.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, a pioneering geneticist and co-winner of the 1995 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, has taken perhaps the most personal approach. With her own money and a $100,000 award from UNESCOL'Oréal's Women in Science Program, she has launched a foundation in her own name that offers grants to young female scientists to pay for babysitters and household help.

Warren E. Buffett's innovation may be the most surprising of all. In what Fortune magazine described as “typical Buffett: rational, original, breaking the mold of how extremely rich people donate money,” the world's second-richest man, after Bill Gates, is giving away 85 percent of his wealth, most of it to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The examples of Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates are inspiring other leading executives and research professionals to bring their imaginations to bear on conducting the business of research.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 6This article was published with the title “More Than Government Grants” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 6 (), p. 52
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1206-52a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe