More Work Is Needed to End Tobacco Smoking

Smoking kills. And although smoking rates are down in many places, it’s going to take more to win the battle against tobacco

Illustration of a person blowing up smoke that looks like a skull.

Daniel Stolle

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Smoking kills. Maybe that’s not the most original thought you’ve read today, but it’s worth repeating. In 2019, around 14% of all deaths were caused by tobacco smoking — and were therefore entirely preventable. What a colossal waste.

The world is generally moving in the right direction. In countries deemed to have the highest level of economic and social development, there are now about as many former smokers as there are current smokers. That is encouraging, as is the decline in the global prevalence of tobacco smoking from 28% in 1990 to 20% in 2019. But we should not confuse progress with victory. As a result of population growth, there are actually more smokers now than there were in 1990.

Nicotine in cigarettes is highly addictive, which makes quitting smoking a miserable experience for many people. A new approach to help people kick the habit involves magnetically stimulating regions of the brain that are involved in addiction. The technique has already been approved for use in the United States, and it could improve considerably as researchers get a better handle on what goes on in a nicotine-addicted brain.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Policies that encourage quitting and discourage new smokers will continue to be crucial to ridding the world of smoking. In general, high-income countries are ahead of their lower-income neighbours in this regard — the US Food and Drug Administration is even considering limiting nicotine levels in cigarettes, to make quitting easier. In low-income countries in Africa, however, even common anti-smoking measures such as raising taxes on cigarettes have proved difficult to implement, in part owing to the interference of tobacco companies.

The negative health effects of smoked tobacco are unquestionable, but the role of nicotine itself in perpetrating these harms is not clear. The rising popularity of alternative nicotine delivery methods, such as e-cigarettes or vapes, is giving researchers more impetus — and more opportunity — to find out.

We are pleased to acknowledge the financial support of Haleon in producing this Outlook. As always, Nature retains sole responsibility for all editorial content.

This article is part of Nature Outlook: Smoking, an editorially independent supplement produced with the financial support of third parties. About this content.

Richard Hodson is senior supplements editor for Nature.

More by Richard Hodson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 329 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Smoking” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 329 No. 2 (), p. 0
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092023-4zsafiEfhXJs0Ec5bkFWR2

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe