New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

More Work Is Needed to End Tobacco Smoking

Smoking kills. And although smoking rates are down in many places, it’s going to take more to win the battle against tobacco

Illustration of a person blowing up smoke that looks like a skull.

Daniel Stolle

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Smoking kills. Maybe that’s not the most original thought you’ve read today, but it’s worth repeating. In 2019, around 14% of all deaths were caused by tobacco smoking — and were therefore entirely preventable. What a colossal waste.

The world is generally moving in the right direction. In countries deemed to have the highest level of economic and social development, there are now about as many former smokers as there are current smokers. That is encouraging, as is the decline in the global prevalence of tobacco smoking from 28% in 1990 to 20% in 2019. But we should not confuse progress with victory. As a result of population growth, there are actually more smokers now than there were in 1990.

Nicotine in cigarettes is highly addictive, which makes quitting smoking a miserable experience for many people. A new approach to help people kick the habit involves magnetically stimulating regions of the brain that are involved in addiction. The technique has already been approved for use in the United States, and it could improve considerably as researchers get a better handle on what goes on in a nicotine-addicted brain.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Policies that encourage quitting and discourage new smokers will continue to be crucial to ridding the world of smoking. In general, high-income countries are ahead of their lower-income neighbours in this regard — the US Food and Drug Administration is even considering limiting nicotine levels in cigarettes, to make quitting easier. In low-income countries in Africa, however, even common anti-smoking measures such as raising taxes on cigarettes have proved difficult to implement, in part owing to the interference of tobacco companies.

The negative health effects of smoked tobacco are unquestionable, but the role of nicotine itself in perpetrating these harms is not clear. The rising popularity of alternative nicotine delivery methods, such as e-cigarettes or vapes, is giving researchers more impetus — and more opportunity — to find out.

We are pleased to acknowledge the financial support of Haleon in producing this Outlook. As always, Nature retains sole responsibility for all editorial content.

This article is part of Nature Outlook: Smoking, an editorially independent supplement produced with the financial support of third parties. About this content.

Richard Hodson is senior supplements editor for Nature.

More by Richard Hodson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 329 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Smoking” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 329 No. 2 (), p. 0
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092023-4zsafiEfhXJs0Ec5bkFWR2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe