Mosquito Immune System Recruited in Fight against Malaria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

For a large portion of the world, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, the buzz of mosquitoes carries with it the threat of malaria. The disease, caused by the plasmodium parasite, infects hundreds of millions of people annually and kills nearly a million. Anti-malarial drugs can prevent the disease from becoming fatal, but parasites can grow resistant to their effects. "Many researchers focus on the direct effects of plasmodium on the human body but the mosquito is an equally important battleground in fighting the disease," notes Fotis C. Kafatos of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. In a report published today in the journal Science, his team describes three genes that could help scientists employ the insect¿s own immune system to stop malaria¿s spread.

Kafatos and his colleagues identified three mosquito immune genes that can affect the parasite¿s life cycle within the mosquito species (Anopheles gambiae) that transmits most cases of malaria in Africa . Two of these genes, dubbed CTL4 and CTLMA2, encode proteins that seem to safeguard the developing parasites. When the scientists silenced them, the mosquitoes¿ immune systems destroyed up to 97 percent of the maturing parasites. The third gene, LRIM1, has the opposite effect: mosquitoes lacking LRIM1 produced more parasites than their normal counterparts did.

"These studies are the first to show the power of the mosquito¿s immune system and give us some very real options for fighting the disease in the insect before it even has a chance to be passed to a human," Kafatos comments. The authors of an accompanying commentary, Janet Hemingway and Alister Craig of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, agree that the results are encouraging, but note that they are just a small initial step toward new treatments. The findings, they write, "give cause for optimism that new methods of malaria control through blocking transmission in the mosquito vector will be possible."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American