Mosquitoes Will Save Us All ... from Mosquitoes

Scientists are turning the infectious bloodsuckers into allies in the global war on disease

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

This month the first U.S. experiment to release genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes into the wild gets put to a vote in Key Haven, Fla., and the county of Monroe. If the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District then approves the trial, U.K. biotech firm Oxitec will release millions of mutant male mosquitoes that had required an antibiotic to stay alive until adulthood. These males will pass the dependency to their offspring, which will then die without access to the drug. The resulting population plummet could reduce the risk of mosquitoes spreading diseases such as dengue fever—Key Haven suffered an outbreak in 2009–2010—and the growing threat of the Zika virus.

Many in Key Haven have voiced concerns about the safety of hosting GM insects in their backyards, but outside experts say these mosquitoes would be innocuous. “There are no potential [health] risks to the Oxitec genetically modified mosquitoes approach,” says Thomas Miller, an emeritus professor of entomology at the University of California, Riverside. And although this would be a first for the U.S., previous Oxitec field trials in other countries have successfully reduced local mosquito populations by more than 90 percent without any indication of worrisome side effects. Indeed, dozens of experiments with altered mosquitoes have taken place over the past five years throughout the world in an effort to squash the spread of mosquito-associated diseases. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American