New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Most Microbial Species Are “Dark Matter”

Microbes that have never been studied in the lab make up the vast majority of such life-forms outside the human body

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Just as most of the matter in the universe is thought to be “dark matter,” much of Earth is populated by a kind of microbial analogue: microorganisms that are known to exist but have never been grown in a laboratory.

A new study, published last September in mSystems, suggests such microbes could account for up to 81 percent of all bacterial genera that live outside the human body. These little-known organisms could hold the secrets to new tools for treating disease and could help us understand life in extreme environments, such as those on other planets.

Credit: Amanda Montañez; Source: “Phylogenetically Novel Uncultured Microbial Cells Dominate Earth Microbiomes,” by Karen G. Lloyd et al., in mSystems, Vol. 3, No. 5; September/October 2018


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Microbes are the most abundant life-form on Earth. Researchers have sequenced the DNA of many species out in the field, but they can be difficult to culture in the lab, and scientists usually grow only one species at a time to study them in a controlled setting. To determine how much microbial dark matter exists, Karen Lloyd, a microbiologist at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and her colleagues compared all known microbial DNA sequences with the subset from species that have already been cultured. They then inferred the fraction of microbes that have been sequenced but never cultured (graphic). “We're discovering numerically that so many of the microbes on Earth are things we have never really learned anything about,” Lloyd says.

The sheer number of microbial species—possibly close to a trillion—means that scientists cannot possibly collect them all. Many species exist in hard-to-reach places, such as at the bottom of the ocean or under frozen Arctic soil. Furthermore, not all microbes can survive in cultures designed to nurture just one strain. Some can grow only in a far more complex, natural environment, notes environmental microbiologist Laura Hug of the University of Waterloo in Ontario, who was not involved in the study. “They get what they need from their community,” she says, “so that means you can't really grow them on their own.”

But Lloyd is optimistic. “We have made great strides with just the known microbes, and there are potentially even more discoveries hidden in these [unknown ones],” she says. “It leaves open the possibility for really grand discoveries.”

Dana Najjar is a software engineer currently pursuing a master's in science journalism at New York University. She is originally from Beirut, Lebanon.

More by Dana Najjar
Scientific American Magazine Vol 320 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Microbial Dark Matter” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 320 No. 3 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0319-14

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe