Mother Right Whales May Hold Key to Species' Survival, Study Finds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: ¿NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM

When it comes to the endangered Northern right whale, it seems mother not only knows best, she is best for the species' survival. A study published in the current issue of Nature suggests that saving just two female right whales a year would stop the species' slide toward extinction.

The Northern right whale faced extinction once before, around 1900, as a result of hunting. A subsequent ban on commercial fishing allowed the animals to recover, but since 1990 their numbers have dwindled to the current estimate of only 300 whales. To determine the cause of this decline, Masami Fujiwara and Hal Caswell of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution studied more than 10,000 whale sightings since 1980. The whales' distinctive markings allow scientists to recognize individuals and track their movements.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers determined that increased mortality of mother whales is behind the species' diminishing numbers. Females take more than 10 years to reach sexual maturity and usually produce only one calf every three to five years. In 1980 the life expectancy of a female whale was 50 years, but by 1995 it was less than 15 years. Saving just two females a year, the study found, could stop the population decline. This finding is in contrast to previous suggestions that the population was declining because females couldn't find suitable mates.

The new analysis makes the conservation value of single whales compellingly clear, writes Peter Kareiva of The Nature Conservancy in an accompanying commentary in the same issue. "Fujiwara and Caswell," he notes, "have shown us the importance of highlighting what might at first glance seem like insignificant numbers of deaths."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe