New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Musical Training Aids Memory

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


People who learn to play an instrument may reap benefits that aren't musical in nature, according to a new study. Findings published this month in the journal Neuropsychology indicate that children with training in music have better verbal memory skills than do their peers who haven't received musical instruction.

Agnes S. Chan of Chinese University in Hong Kong and her colleagues tested 90 boys between the ages of six and 15. Half of the students belonged to a school orchestra and had received additional musical training, whereas the other half had not been taught how to play an instrument. The researchers compared the students' verbal memory skills, such as recalling words from a list, and their visual memory for images. They found that boys with musical training remembered significantly more words than the nonmusical students did and retained more words after 30-minute delays. What is more, performance on the verbal learning tasks rose in proportion to the length of musical training. Music instruction had no effect on visual memory, however.

The scientists note that the improved verbal memory stems from musical training because both tasks engage the same section of the brain, the left temporal region. A follow-up study a year after the first indicated that the effects are long-lasting--children who had stopped their musical training retained the verbal memory advantage gained from the instruction. In addition, Chan notes that music's benefits may spill over into other areas, noting that "students with better verbal memory probably will find it easier to learn in school."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe