Mutation Makes Rats More Sensitive to Alcohol's Effects

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Alcohol has been a drink of choice for people for thousands of years, but scientists still do not know just how the stuff affects brain function when people become intoxicated. New research reveals that genetic change in a single nucleotide is enough to heighten alcohol sensitivity in rats and could help scientists design novel therapeutic approaches for alcoholism.

Researchers from the University of California at Los Angeles led by H. Jacob Hanchar and Paul D. Dodson tested how rats reacted to varying doses of alcohol. The team tested animals that had a naturally occurring gene mutation--a single nucleotide difference that in turn changes one amino acid in the receptor proteins for GABA neurotransmitters--and compared them to rats without the mutation. After imbibing, the animals performed a balancing task and underwent blood-alcohol testing. The animals with the mutation fell off a rolling log much sooner than the control animals did, which suggests that the mutation left them much less tolerant to alcohol's effects. Although the blood-alcohol levels of the mutants (which were equivalent to those of the control animals) indicated that they should have been slightly intoxicated , their behavior was significantly more impaired.

GABA receptors in humans and rats are very similar and the fact that the mutation occurs naturally suggests that people, too, may be genetically predisposed to be hypersensitive to alcohol's effects. Study co-author Thomas Otis notes that the findings could guide researchers in their quest to develop new drugs for treating alcohol addiction or for acute cases of alcohol poisoning. The findings appear online today in the journal Nature Neuroscience.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe