Mutation May Explain Susceptibility to West Nile Virus

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1999 the now-infamous West Nile virus emerged in the eastern U.S., and every summer since then the scourge has resurfaced and spread. This year alone has witnessed 251 recorded cases, 11 of which resulted in death. Why certain of the virus's victims--around 20 percent--go on to develop symptoms while the others remain symptom-free has been a mystery. But new research suggests that some people infected with West Nile may carry a genetic mutation that predisposes them to developing the trademark fever and encephalitis.

The findings, detailed in a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, come from studies of laboratory mice infected with the virus. It turns out that mice with a mutation in a gene encoding one of a group of enzymes known as oligoadenylate synthetases, which are known to help fight viral infections, die quickly from the disease. Wild mice carrying a normal copy of the gene, on the other hand, are almost completely resistant. The study results suggest that the enzyme plays a critical role in West Nile pathogenesis, conclude Jean-Louis Gu¿net of the Pasteur Institute in Paris and his colleagues.

The next step will be to scrutinize the same genetic region in humans. "Given the low background of immunity, [West Nile] virus spread and amplified transmission has the potential to result in future summertime epidemics," Charles Samuel of the University of California at Santa Barbara writes in an accompanying commentary. Understanding the role genes play in susceptibility and resistance, he adds, is thus of utmost importance.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe