My, What a Big Salad You Have

When people see health food as larger, they are more likely to want to eat it

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Dieters are engaged in a constant battle between losing weight and eating tasty food. Now a study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology suggests that buttering up the brain with images of health food may help people see these items as more tempting. Researchers at Utrecht University in the Netherlands prompted unsuccessful dieters with pictures of healthy foods, then found that, later, subjects viewed portions of these foods as bigger than they actually were. Previous research suggests that people are more likely to choose foods perceived as “bigger” at mealtimes. So if you’re trying to eat better, try flipping through the veggie chapter in a cookbook rather than sitting through the junk food ads on TV—seeing pictures of nutritious items could influence your choices.

Carrie Arnold is an independent public health journalist in Virginia.

More by Carrie Arnold
SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 1This article was published with the title “My, What a Big Salad You Have” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 1 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0311-14b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe