Mysterious Group of Extinct Humans Was More Diverse Than Neandertals

DNA from Denisovans suggests they lived in Siberia for millennia and were more genetically diverse than Neandertals, but less diverse than modern humans

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A mysterious extinct branch of the human family tree that once interbred with modern humans was more genetically diverse than Neanderthals, a finding that also suggests many of these early humans called Denisovans existed in what is now southern Siberia, researchers say.

In 2008, scientists unearthed a finger bone and teeth in Denisova cave in Siberia's Altai Mountains that belonged to lost relatives now known as the Denisovans (dee-NEE-soh-vens). Analysis of DNA extracted from a finger bone from a young Denisovan girl suggested they shared a common origin with Neanderthals, but were nearly as genetically distinct from Neanderthals as Neanderthals were from living people.

A deeper understanding of extinct human lineages could shed light on modern human evolution. For instance, analysis of the Denisovan genome showed that Denisovans have contributed on the order of 5 percent of their DNA to the genomes of present-day people in Oceania, and about 0.2 percent to the genomes of Native Americans and mainland Asians. These DNA contributions not only signify interbreeding between the two groups (scientists have yet to definitively call Denisovans a separate species), but also may explain the origin of some traits of living humans. [See Photos of Denisovan Fossils and Siberian Cave]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"In Tibet, an adaptation to live at high altitudes where there is little oxygen in the air has been shown to come from Denisovans," said study co-author Svante Pääbo, an evolutionary geneticist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

Now scientists have analyzed two molars found in Denisova cave. Compared with the teeth of Neanderthals and modern humans, those Denisova teeth are very large and lack traits such as certain raised points on the crowns of molars, supporting the suggestion that Denisovans were distinct from both groups.

Analysis of the DNA from the two Denisovan molars, combined with previous analysis of the Denisovan finger bone, suggests that all three specimens belonged to three individuals of the same species. (The DNA from each specimen was different enough from the others to show they came from different individuals.)

"This is the first time we can look at genetic variation among Denisovan individuals," Pääbo told Live Science.

The researchers also found that while Denisovans were not as genetically diverse as present-day humans, Denisovans were slightly more genetically diverse than Neanderthals. This suggests "there must have been quite many of them over quite a long time," Pääbo said.

In addition, the genetic analysis revealed that DNA from one molar accumulated fewer mutations than the other tooth or the finger bone. This suggested that molar was on the order of 60,000 years older than the other two specimens, a difference that suggests "that the Denisovans were present in the Altai Mountains in southern Siberia over a very long time, or at least that they were there periodically over a long time," Pääbo said.

The scientists detailed their findings online today (Nov. 16) in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe