New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mysterious Hot Spot Raises Questions about Source of Jupiter's X-Rays

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists using the Chandra X-ray Observatory have discovered on Jupiter a particularly active region of x-ray emission near the planet's north magnetic pole. The identification of this hot spot, along with evidence that the x-rays radiate in pulses, appears to rule out a previous explanation for the source of the phenomenon. Reporting their findings in the current edition of the journal Nature, the researchers suggest that the pulsating x-rays could be the product of the interaction between solar winds and Jupiter's outer magnetic fields.

Prior to this finding, scientists thought that energetic ions originating from Jupiter¿s moon Io produced the x-rays. In this scenario, Jupiter's inner magnetosphere accelerates oxygen and sulfur ions from Io, flinging some of them into the atmosphere. These heavy, energetic ions then collide with atmospheric hydrogen and helium ions, generating x-rays. According to team member Randy Gladstone of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Tex., the new data invalidates this theory. Specifically, that model fails to explain both the location of the hot spot at the higher latitude and the fact that the x-rays pulsate with periods of 45 minutes, rather than emanating steadily. Both of these factors imply that the heavy ions must be coming from much farther away than Io, Gladstone says. The researchers thus propose that the sun may instead be the source: solar winds could carry heavy ions to Jupiter and deposit them in the outer magnetosphere, they propose. Once trapped in this powerful magnetic field, the heavy ions oscillate between Jupiter's poles, producing the pulsating x-rays. Time will tell whether this theory holds water. But whatever the source of the newly identified hot spot x-rays, the team concludes, once pinpointed it should explain other emissions as well.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe