Mysterious Hot Spot Raises Questions about Source of Jupiter's X-Rays

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists using the Chandra X-ray Observatory have discovered on Jupiter a particularly active region of x-ray emission near the planet's north magnetic pole. The identification of this hot spot, along with evidence that the x-rays radiate in pulses, appears to rule out a previous explanation for the source of the phenomenon. Reporting their findings in the current edition of the journal Nature, the researchers suggest that the pulsating x-rays could be the product of the interaction between solar winds and Jupiter's outer magnetic fields.

Prior to this finding, scientists thought that energetic ions originating from Jupiter¿s moon Io produced the x-rays. In this scenario, Jupiter's inner magnetosphere accelerates oxygen and sulfur ions from Io, flinging some of them into the atmosphere. These heavy, energetic ions then collide with atmospheric hydrogen and helium ions, generating x-rays. According to team member Randy Gladstone of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Tex., the new data invalidates this theory. Specifically, that model fails to explain both the location of the hot spot at the higher latitude and the fact that the x-rays pulsate with periods of 45 minutes, rather than emanating steadily. Both of these factors imply that the heavy ions must be coming from much farther away than Io, Gladstone says. The researchers thus propose that the sun may instead be the source: solar winds could carry heavy ions to Jupiter and deposit them in the outer magnetosphere, they propose. Once trapped in this powerful magnetic field, the heavy ions oscillate between Jupiter's poles, producing the pulsating x-rays. Time will tell whether this theory holds water. But whatever the source of the newly identified hot spot x-rays, the team concludes, once pinpointed it should explain other emissions as well.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe