Mysteriously Young ‘Peekaboo’ Galaxy Could Reveal Secrets of Early Universe

A strange discovery could provide a window into the universe’s earliest galaxies

Peekaboo galaxy shimmers to the right of a foreground star.

NASA, ESA and Igor Karachentsev/ SAO RAS; Image processing: Alyssa Pagan/ STScI

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A galaxy that is just emerging from hiding may be one of the youngest ever discovered, offering a potential portal to the secrets of the early universe. Aptly named “Peekaboo,” the galaxy moved from behind a bright star (from our perspective) only within the past 50 to 100 years. But it's not just the galaxy's relatively recent appearance that has astronomers excited. In results published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, scientists report that Peekaboo appears to have a significant lack of old stars. The new measurements suggest the dwarf galaxy may have formed billions of years after the big bang—much later than other galaxies close to ours.

“Pretty much every galaxy in the nearby universe has very, very old stars dating back to shortly after the big bang,” says Gagandeep Anand, an astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute and co-author of the new study. As stars age, they create heavier elements, including metals. Peekaboo is one of just three comparatively nearby galaxies that astronomers have found to be extremely metal-poor—and at 22 million light-years away, it's by far the closest, making it favorable for further study.

Astronomers first spotted a hint of the Peekaboo galaxy in 2001 during an all-sky survey, but the glare of a closer star largely obscured it from additional scrutiny. High-quality images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2020 confirmed the partially hidden object to be a dwarf galaxy, and later optical observations revealed a lack of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium—suggesting that Peekaboo's conditions could mimic those of galaxies in the early universe.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers don't yet know whether Peekaboo's metal-poor state definitively indicates its age. “There are other possibilities to consider as well,” says Rutgers University astrophysicist Kristen McQuinn, who was not involved in the new study. One alternative possibility she suggests is that Peekaboo, as a dwarf galaxy, has a relatively weak gravitational pull that allowed its heavy metals to be expelled by galactic winds.

Current measurements don't suggest that the galaxy has any stars older than two billion or three billion years, but Anand notes that follow-up observations, perhaps with the ultrapowerful James Webb Space Telescope, would allow the researchers to search for fainter stars as old as 13 billion years. If found, such stars would call Peekaboo's youth into question.

But if the Peekaboo galaxy is as young as the researchers think it could be, it would be one of the best laboratories available to study the way the universe was closer to the big bang. Researchers could come away with a better understanding of the physics of gas cooling and star formation in an environment like the early universe, McQuinn says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe