New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Myths of the City

Problems of urbanization are mostly false stereotypes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From the beginning of the Christian era to about 1850, the urban population of the world never exceeded 7 percent. The Industrial Revolution quickly changed that--today 75 percent of people in the U.S. and other developed countries live in cities, according to the United Nations.

As the chart shows, urbanization in the developing countries (such as China and India) and the least developed countries (such as Ethiopia and Bangladesh) has long lagged behind that of the West and Japan. Early in the 20th century probably no more than 5 percent of the population in European colonies clustered in cities. But since then, the proportion in these ex-colonies and the never-colonized nations has increased twice as fast as that of the West. New York City, for instance, took about 150 years to add eight million, but Mexico City added 16 million in just 50 years. Such extraordinary growth has exacerbated the usual problems of development, making it difficult to supply drinking water, sewage disposal, police protection and other amenities. The comparatively slow pace of European urbanization was partly the result of 45 million or so people emigrating to the New World rather than moving to cities.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe