Myths of the City

Problems of urbanization are mostly false stereotypes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From the beginning of the Christian era to about 1850, the urban population of the world never exceeded 7 percent. The Industrial Revolution quickly changed that--today 75 percent of people in the U.S. and other developed countries live in cities, according to the United Nations.

As the chart shows, urbanization in the developing countries (such as China and India) and the least developed countries (such as Ethiopia and Bangladesh) has long lagged behind that of the West and Japan. Early in the 20th century probably no more than 5 percent of the population in European colonies clustered in cities. But since then, the proportion in these ex-colonies and the never-colonized nations has increased twice as fast as that of the West. New York City, for instance, took about 150 years to add eight million, but Mexico City added 16 million in just 50 years. Such extraordinary growth has exacerbated the usual problems of development, making it difficult to supply drinking water, sewage disposal, police protection and other amenities. The comparatively slow pace of European urbanization was partly the result of 45 million or so people emigrating to the New World rather than moving to cities.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe