Nanomold for Metal Wires

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For the parade of ever-shrinking optoelectric devices to push on, engineers must be able to fashion ultraminiature wires with exacting precision. A new technique described today in Science should help. Paul Weiss of Pennsylvania State University and his colleagues have developed a "molecular ruler" construction process for making many thin wires¿measuring from 15 to 70 nanometers wide and spaced only 10 to 40 nanometers apart¿all at once. "We had a lot of different ways we were trying to make closely spaced, precise structures," Weiss says. "We had four people in the group trying six different ways."

Fortunately one worked like a charm. The scientists started the process by creating parallel gold nanostructures on a silicate substrate using standard electron-beam lithography. Then they applied layers of an organic molecule called mercaptoalkonoic acid on top. This film coating systematically made the original structures wider¿and the gaps between them smaller. And because the researchers knew the size and spacing of the initial structures and the width of the organic layers, they could calculate the sizes of the narrowing gaps.

Using this "molecular ruler" like a mold, they could then fill the gaps with gold to form nanoscale wires with a known diameter. "It is a single fabrication process," Weiss remarks. "You do not have to draw every single line one at a time. You simply do the overall design and then in one set of steps you can complete the whole surface. We can make a number of shapes and sizes that we cannot make by other means."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe