Nanoparticles Can't Hide

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Detecting a virus or any nanosize particle usually means fixing it to a substrate or attaching a fluorescent probe to it. Neither method is practical for detecting particles in real time. Now University of Rochester physicists have assembled a simple system for doing just that. They split a laser beam in two, sending one half to a sample. When the light hit a small particle, it scattered back and recombined with the reserved half of the laser beam, producing a detectable interference pattern only when a moving particle was present. The method works where others do not, the researchers say, because it relies on the light's amplitude rather than intensity. The amplitude is the square root of intensity, so it decays much less than intensity as particles get smaller. The investigators have so far detected single particles as small as seven nanometers across. Peruse their findings in the January 13 Physical Review Letters.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Nanoparticles Can't Hide” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 3 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0306-29c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe