Nanoparticles Can Stack Themselves Like Cheerleaders

Self-assembling nanoparticles may be key to new materials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Like cheerleaders forming a human pyramid, particles, too, can assemble themselves into intricate patterns. In a new study, researchers at the University of Michigan found that an object's shape greatly affects how it responds to crowding and that, with a properly designed shape, tiny material building blocks known as nanoparticles could self-assemble into predictable larger structures simply by being forced to share space with neighbors. The study, which appeared in the July 27 Science, could help researchers design new materials.

The investigators ran computer simulations of 145 different particles having idealized polyhedral shapes. (A polyhedron is a solid formed by planar faces.) When packed closely with identically shaped particles, most of those polyhedrons assembled into a crystal lattice or a crystal-like arrangement. Study co-author Sharon Glotzer, a Michigan professor of chemical engineering, materials science and physics, and her colleagues had previously found that some particle shapes naturally self-assemble. Yet the new simulations showed that such behavior is the rule, not the exception.

Moreover, some of the shapes displayed an impressively coordinated assembly process. A pyramid shape with a square base joined into “supercubes” of six pyramids apiece, which then formed a larger cubic lattice. The researchers also found that the collective behavior of a given particle type is far from random. In fact, two numbers all but foretell the outcome. A number called the isoperimetric quotient, which roughly captures a particle's shape, and a measure called the coordination number, which describes how many neighbors a particle has, predicted 94 percent of the time which crystalline form a polyhedron would take. The relation between shape and self-assembly could be used to tailor nanoparticles to exhibit a specific collective behavior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is sort of a holy grail of materials research: to just look at a building block and be able to say, ‘Oh yes, I know all the kinds of crystal structure that would be stable with this,’” Glotzer says. “This study allows us to take a first step in that direction.”

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Stuff That Designs Itself” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 4 (), p. 27
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1012-27

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe