New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Nanoparticles Can Stack Themselves Like Cheerleaders

Self-assembling nanoparticles may be key to new materials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Like cheerleaders forming a human pyramid, particles, too, can assemble themselves into intricate patterns. In a new study, researchers at the University of Michigan found that an object's shape greatly affects how it responds to crowding and that, with a properly designed shape, tiny material building blocks known as nanoparticles could self-assemble into predictable larger structures simply by being forced to share space with neighbors. The study, which appeared in the July 27 Science, could help researchers design new materials.

The investigators ran computer simulations of 145 different particles having idealized polyhedral shapes. (A polyhedron is a solid formed by planar faces.) When packed closely with identically shaped particles, most of those polyhedrons assembled into a crystal lattice or a crystal-like arrangement. Study co-author Sharon Glotzer, a Michigan professor of chemical engineering, materials science and physics, and her colleagues had previously found that some particle shapes naturally self-assemble. Yet the new simulations showed that such behavior is the rule, not the exception.

Moreover, some of the shapes displayed an impressively coordinated assembly process. A pyramid shape with a square base joined into “supercubes” of six pyramids apiece, which then formed a larger cubic lattice. The researchers also found that the collective behavior of a given particle type is far from random. In fact, two numbers all but foretell the outcome. A number called the isoperimetric quotient, which roughly captures a particle's shape, and a measure called the coordination number, which describes how many neighbors a particle has, predicted 94 percent of the time which crystalline form a polyhedron would take. The relation between shape and self-assembly could be used to tailor nanoparticles to exhibit a specific collective behavior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is sort of a holy grail of materials research: to just look at a building block and be able to say, ‘Oh yes, I know all the kinds of crystal structure that would be stable with this,’” Glotzer says. “This study allows us to take a first step in that direction.”

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Stuff That Designs Itself” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 4 (), p. 27
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1012-27

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe