New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Nanotech for New Organs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have taken what may be a key step toward creating human organs such as livers and kidneys. Taking their cue from the body's own vascular system, researchers from M.I.T. and Harvard Medical School constructed a microscopic device capable of supplying oxygen and nutrients to organ cells.

Recent efforts to grow new organs have met with limited success. Whereas researchers have managed to make skin and cartilage, functional vital organs have eluded them. The problem, explains M.I.T.'s Mohammad Kaazempur-Mofrad, is that although conventional tissue engineering methods provide a scaffold for the cells of the tissue, they do not offer the vascular support necessary to nourish organs such as livers and kidneys.

To address that problem, Kaazempur-Mofrad and his colleagues used fractal computational models to design networks mimicking the intricate branching pattern of actual blood vessels. They then etched those nano networks onto silicon surfaces, which in turn served as molds for biocompatible polymer films. The next step was to sandwich a microporous membrane between two films and seal them together.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Our microfabricated devices can efficiently supply oxygen and nutrients to sustain the viability of human liver and kidney cells for at least one week in the lab," Kaazempur-Mofrad reported yesterday at the American Society for Microbiology's conference on Bio- Micro- Nano-systems in New York City. In experiments, 96 percent of kidney cells incorporated into the artificial vascular network lived for one week; 95 percent of liver cells survived for two weeks. A liver system implanted into rats lasted a week.

So far, the team has experimented with only single-layer devices, as opposed to the 30 to 50 layers researchers believe are required to represent an operational liver. "But the ultimate goal," Kaazempur-Mofrad remarks, "is to make whole, functional organs."

"Less is More in Medicine," by A. Paul Alivisatos (Scientific American, September 2001), is available for purchase from Scientific American Digital. "Growing New Organs," by David J. Mooney and Antonios G. Mikos (Scientific American, April 1999), is available for purchase from Scientific American Digital. "Skin: The First Tissue-Engineered Products," by Nancy Parenteau and Gail Naughton (Scientific American, April 1999), is available for purchase from Scientific American Digital. "Tissue Engineering: The Challenges Ahead," by Robert S. Langer and Joseph P. Vacanti (Scientific American, April 1999), is available for purchase from Scientific American Digital.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe