Napping May Be Good for Your Heart

Your boss may balk, but a new study shows that getting some midday shut-eye could be heart-healthy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Like to kick back for an afternoon siesta? Good news: a new study shows that regular napping may cut your risk of dying from a heart attack or other heart problems.

In the largest study to date on the effects of midday snoozing, researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and the University of Athens Medical School in Greece, tracked 23,681 apparently healthy men and women, ages 20 to 86, for more than six years.

Their findings, published in today's Archives of Internal Medicine: those who took afternoon siestas of 30 minutes or more at least three times a week had a 37 percent lower risk of dying from heart disease than those who did not.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even more impressive: researchers found that working men who took regular or occasional naps had a 64 percent lower risk of death from heart attacks or other heart-related ills than their nonnapping compeers. And working women? "The apparent effect was evident mainly among working men," says lead study author Dimitrios Trichopoulos. "There were not enough coronary deaths among working women (only six) in this group to allow sound inference." (Of course, some might consider that a positive thing.)

Trichopoulos, a cancer prevention and epidemiology professor at HSPH, says researchers decided to look into this issue, because coronary mortality tends to be low in populations in which the prevalence of siestas tends to be high.

"Our working hypothesis has been that napping may have stress-releasing properties," he says.

Researchers speculate that the extra shut-eye may help reduce chronic stresswhich has been implicated in heart diseaseby giving workers a break from angst-ridden jobs.

Trichopoulos says that if further studies net similar results, "then lifestyle changes that would allow afternoon napping might have to be considered." Of course, that's easier said than done, especially in the United States, where employers are not exactly known to encourage workers to nap. "I am fully aware that the lifestyle in the U.S. does not leave much room for changes of this type," he says.

But afternoon siestas have long been a part of daily life in Greece, where the study took place, as well as in other Mediterranean and some Latin American countries, which tend to have low mortality rates from coronary disease.

The Mediterranean diet, rich in fruits, vegetables, beans and olive oil, has also been credited for keeping a lid on heart disease. Trichopoulos says the study controlled for diet, physical activity and other factors that are predictive of coronary mortality.

He notes that researchers would like to review the data again once there are "more outcomes among men and particularly women.

"No firm conclusions can be drawn on the basis of this study alone, except that the issue is worth further investigation," Trichopoulos says. "Right now, we would only reassure those who take a siesta that this may actually be not simply pleasant and relaxing, but also a healthy habit."

His advice: "For those whose lifestyle allows having a nap, go ahead and do so." No doubt your boss will be thrilled.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe