NASA Exoplanet Hunter Racks Up Bizarre Worlds and Exploding Stars

The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite has identified at least eight planets, including one with a mass more than 20 times that of Earth

An artist’s rendition of the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), a spacecraft designed to find some of our sun’s nearest neighboring planetary systems.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Just nine months after its launch, NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) has found at least eight planets, with more than 300 planetary candidates waiting in the wings.

A bizarre planet at least 23 times the mass of Earth, unveiled on 7 January, is among the confirmed planets—some of which have been reported before.

The newly described planet whizzes around its star on a stretched-out orbit once every 36 days, says Xu Chelsea Huang, a TESS scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge. Even stranger, there are hints that another planet not much bigger than Earth is orbiting closer to the star.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How a small inner planet stays on that path as a bigger planet lurches on an elliptical orbit around the same star is a mystery. “This is the most extreme system with this type of architecture,” Huang says. “We don’t know how that could form.” The star is known as HD 21749 and lies 16 parsecs (53 light years) from Earth in the constellation Reticulum.

Huang reported the findings at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Seattle, Washington.

A catalogue of oddities

TESS’s other discoveries include a super-hot world, LHS 3844 b, that whirls around its star—a red dwarf only 15% the size of the Sun—every 11 hours. Details on another 20 to 30 planets discovered by TESS are on the verge of being published, Huang says.

TESS works better than team members had dared to dream, says George Ricker, a physicist at MIT and the mission’s principal investigator. Its four cameras can see objects 20% fainter, and focus more sharply, than originally expected.

The spacecraft also does more than hunt planets. Mission scientists have studied 101 stars that brightened suddenly, probably because they were exploding supernovae, says Michael Fausnaugh, an astronomer at MIT. Because TESS stares non-stop at one slice of the sky for 27 days, then moves to a neighbouring slice, it captures an unprecedented view of these exploding stars as they brighten and then dim.

“Based on the brightness and shape of that flare, there’s a lot of science that can be done,” Fausnaugh says. For instance, astronomers can scrutinize the way in which the light increases for clues to the type of star that exploded to create a particular flash. TESS discovered six supernovae in just its first month of observing; its predecessor, NASA’s Kepler space telescope, discovered five over the course of four years, Fausnaugh says.

TESS is in the process of scanning the entire southern sky, after which it will turn and canvass the northern sky.

The spacecraft could conceivably keep working for decades, Ricker says. His team is now writing a proposal to NASA asking that TESS’s mission be extended past its initial two years. That deadline for the proposal was 1 February—but the ongoing partial US government shutdown means Ricker isn’t sure how that timing could change.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on January 8, 2019.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe