New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA just dropped a stunning new Hubble image of a ‘Cosmic Sea Lemon’ 5,000 light-years away

The Hubble Space Telescope turns 36 this year. And to celebrate, it released an incredible new image of the Trifid Nebula

Formation of gas in a stellar nursery.

A Hubble Space Telescope image of the Trifid Nebula in 2026.

NASA/ESA/STScI/Joseph DePasquale/STScI

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes it pays to return to the places you’ve been before. That’s certainly the case for NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, which just released an ethereal new image of a strange formation that the agency calls a “Cosmic Sea Lemon” or a “Cosmic Sea Slug” hidden inside a stellar nursery some 5,000 light-years away.

Hubble has seen this formation before. In 1997 the telescope photographed the gassy region inside the Trifid Nebula, which lies within the constellation Sagittarius.

Astronomers decided to re-create the original Hubble image in honor of the 36th anniversary of the space telescope’s launch on April 24, 1990. In the new photograph, the Trifid Nebula is just as cloudy as ever—but there are a few key differences between the two images.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Side-by-side images of a stellar nursery at different times.

Images of the Trifid Nebula taken in 2026 (left) and 1997 (right).

NASA/ESA/STScI/Joseph DePasquale/STScI/Jeff Hester/Arizona State University

The formation’s “horn”—a jet of plasma expelled by a protostar—is now noticeably longer than it appeared nearly three decades ago. And a slash of orange and red along the Cosmic Sea Lemon’s “body” appears to have expanded to the right. These subtle changes may help researchers better understand how stars are forming in a notably active stellar nursery.

The image is also a potent reminder of how far Hubble has come. The space telescope was originally expected to operate for about 15 years. But thanks to a few tune-ups, NASA now expects it to continue capturing images of the universe until at least the mid-2030s.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe