NASA Satellite Catches Star's Death by Black Hole

The Swift telescope has charted a star's plunge into a supermassive black hole at the core of a distant galaxy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A star's long-ago death dive into a black hole generated cosmic fireworks that are revealing more and more about the dramatic encounter. 

The star got too close to its galaxy's central black hole about 290 million years ago, and collisions among its torn-apart pieces caused an eruption of optical, ultraviolet and X-ray light that was first spotted by scientists in 2014.

Fresh observations of this radiation by NASA's Swift telescope have yielded more details about where these different wavelengths were generated in the event, which is called ASASSN-14li, a new study reports. [The Stranges Black Holes in the Universe]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We discovered brightness changes in X-rays that occurred about a month after similar changes were observed in visible and UV light," study lead author Dheeraj Pasham, an astrophysicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said in a NASA statement. "We think this means the optical and UV emission arose far from the black hole, where elliptical streams of orbiting matter crashed into each other."

The doomed star harbored about the same mass as Earth's sun, making it no match for the 3-million-solar-mass black hole that it encountered, NASA officials said. Tidal forces within the black hole overcame the star's gravity, tearing the star apart into a debris stream. 

Next, the debris from this star formed a spinning accretion disk, with the matter compressing and heating before falling into the black hole

The new research suggests that interactions among the debris could generate the optical and UV emission. That's because the debris falling into the black hole at first overshoots it, zinging back out in an elliptical orbit and colliding with incoming pieces, study team members said.

This helps clarify earlier work, which shows that UV and optical wavelengths appeared to be located far from where the black hole's tidal influence would destroy the star.

"Returning clumps of debris strike the incoming stream, which results in shock waves that emit visible and ultraviolet light," said acting Swift principal investigator and study co-author Bradley Cenko, of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "As these clumps fall down to the black hole, they also modulate the X-ray emission there."

The new study was published last week in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Copyright 2017 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Editor's Recommendations

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 covering diversity, education and gaming as well. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time.

More by Elizabeth Howell

SPACE.com is the premier source of space exploration, innovation and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.

More by SPACE.com

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe