NASA Scientists Fight Budget Cuts with "Bake Sale"

The sale is a protest of plans in President Obama's 2013 budget request to cut 21 percent from NASA's planetary science budget, and 38 percent from its Mars projects

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

From  Nature magazine

It has come to this: planetary scientists across the United States hawked baked goods to the public on Saturday in an effort to drum up awareness of their field’s dwindling financial support. They were protesting plans in US President Barack Obama's 2013 budget request to cut 21% from NASA's planetary-science budget, and 38% from its Mars projects.

“The planetary programme is one of the shining examples of NASA at its best,” says Alan Stern, vice-president of research and development in the space science and engineering division at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, who coordinated the nationwide Planetary Exploration Car Wash and Bake Sale. “We’re not asking for a raise, but we sure would prefer not to have such a steep cut.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One site where scientists are becoming agitated is NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, where many Mars missions are built and managed. As the lab held its annual open house on Saturday, planetary scientists from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena and the University of California, Los Angeles enticed visiting space fans to stop outside the entrance for cupcakes and learn about the budget plight.

At times, crowds were small, but the event hosted a steady flow of traffic, said organizer Jennifer Buz, a Caltech seismologist. In addition to sampling cupcakes in flavours such as 'red planet' and 'white dwarf', visitors tapped their toes to live music and entered a raffle to win bits of meteorite. Children trundled around in a pedal car made up to look like a Mars rover.

The planetary scientists weren't hoping to fill their coffers with the revenue from the sale; instead, they offered free sweets in return for signatures on letters beseeching Congress to reverse the cuts. The Pasadena group estimated that it collected hundreds of names.

Planetary protest
Elsewhere, planetary scientists showed that they would do anything to raise awareness. In Boulder, they polished shoes. In Houston, Texas, scientists from the Lunar and Planetary Institute joined forces with the dark side, colluding with costumed Star Wars stormtroopers to attract supporters.

As in the lab, “young people do the grunt work for these things”, notes Matt Siegler, a postdoc studying lunar ice at the JPL. Students and recent PhDs hear 'budget cuts', and foresee their careers fizzling like a failed rocket launch. "Am I going to have to leave the field because of this?" Siegler wonders.

According to Obama’s budget, which is currently under discussion in Congress, planetary research would suffer the greatest blow to any science programme in 2013. But not all parts of the space agency are hurting. The James Webb Space Telescope, set to launch in 2018 but suffering from delays and budget overruns, is gobbling up funds with a 21% increase. And the White House requested that the budget to support commercial space flight be more than doubled.

“I do feel like planetary science is getting picked on,” says Buz. “It’s just looking grimmer and grimmer.”

Researchers fear a future on the unemployment line, with the United States forsaking its lead in the space race and children, with no cool space discoveries to inspire them, losing enthusiasm for science.

And should the nation later decide to get back into planetary studies, it may find that researchers have left the field or moved to countries with ongoing support for their work. “It’ll be too late,” said Kim Lichtenberg, who works on mission operations for the Mars Curiosity rover at the JPL. “There isn’t going to be anything to inspire the next generation. We won’t have people who are trained any more.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on June 11, 2012.

Science writer Amber Dance lives in the Los Angeles area.

More by Amber Dance

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe