New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

NASA Tests Its Flying-Saucer Lander for Mars

The lander, a six-meter Kevlar-inflatable disk, could carry heavier loads to the Red Planet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Landing is the toughest part of any trip to Mars. The planet's atmosphere is too thin for parachutes alone to bleed off a spacecraft's blistering entry speeds, and landing solely via retro-rockets requires more fuel than any near-future mission to Mars is likely to have. NASA uses both techniques together for most of its Mars missions, and even its high-tech Curiosity rover used a vintage 1970s parachute apparatus during its landing in 2012. That technology limits landings to 1.5-ton probes. Anything heavier will yield only a smoking crater. For more robust robotic missions—or eventual human ones—a new approach is required.

This month the space agency plans to test the full conception of a new lander, the Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD), which could deposit twice as much mass across a wide variety of Martian terrain. The LDSD consists of a six-meter Kevlar-insulated inflatable disk and a 30-meter parachute capable of withstanding supersonic speeds—the largest ever deployed. An eight-meter disk suitable for human landings is also under development. Together the relatively lightweight inflatable disk and giant parachute could deliver bulkier payloads to Mars, without requiring large amounts of extra fuel or very heavy atmospheric-entry heat shields.

To test the LDSD, NASA will use Earth's upper stratosphere as a stand-in for the thin Martian atmosphere. First, a giant, football-stadium-sized balloon will hoist a mock lander 37 kilometers high over the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii. Then the LDSD will separate from the balloon and fire rockets to reach higher altitudes and speeds. At a height of 55 kilometers and a velocity nearly four times the speed of sound, its disk will inflate, slowing the vehicle so that the parachute can deploy. This will be the critical moment—aerodynamic forces shredded the parachute during an early flight demonstration in 2014.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If all goes well this time around, about three hours after launch the saucer will splash down in the Pacific, clearing the way for bigger, more sophisticated missions to Mars and other destinations in the solar system. And even if there are hiccups, says Ian Clark, the LDSD lead at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, “we would much rather learn these items now than learn them at Mars.”

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Flying Saucers for Mars” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 6 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0615-23

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe