NASA Tests Its Flying-Saucer Lander for Mars

The lander, a six-meter Kevlar-inflatable disk, could carry heavier loads to the Red Planet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Landing is the toughest part of any trip to Mars. The planet's atmosphere is too thin for parachutes alone to bleed off a spacecraft's blistering entry speeds, and landing solely via retro-rockets requires more fuel than any near-future mission to Mars is likely to have. NASA uses both techniques together for most of its Mars missions, and even its high-tech Curiosity rover used a vintage 1970s parachute apparatus during its landing in 2012. That technology limits landings to 1.5-ton probes. Anything heavier will yield only a smoking crater. For more robust robotic missions—or eventual human ones—a new approach is required.

This month the space agency plans to test the full conception of a new lander, the Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD), which could deposit twice as much mass across a wide variety of Martian terrain. The LDSD consists of a six-meter Kevlar-insulated inflatable disk and a 30-meter parachute capable of withstanding supersonic speeds—the largest ever deployed. An eight-meter disk suitable for human landings is also under development. Together the relatively lightweight inflatable disk and giant parachute could deliver bulkier payloads to Mars, without requiring large amounts of extra fuel or very heavy atmospheric-entry heat shields.

To test the LDSD, NASA will use Earth's upper stratosphere as a stand-in for the thin Martian atmosphere. First, a giant, football-stadium-sized balloon will hoist a mock lander 37 kilometers high over the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii. Then the LDSD will separate from the balloon and fire rockets to reach higher altitudes and speeds. At a height of 55 kilometers and a velocity nearly four times the speed of sound, its disk will inflate, slowing the vehicle so that the parachute can deploy. This will be the critical moment—aerodynamic forces shredded the parachute during an early flight demonstration in 2014.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If all goes well this time around, about three hours after launch the saucer will splash down in the Pacific, clearing the way for bigger, more sophisticated missions to Mars and other destinations in the solar system. And even if there are hiccups, says Ian Clark, the LDSD lead at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, “we would much rather learn these items now than learn them at Mars.”

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk editor for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Flying Saucers for Mars” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 6 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0615-23

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe