New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Natural History, 1915 [Slide Show]

A look at how we saw the natural world a century ago

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1915 only 56 years had passed since the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Then, as now, the ramifications of evolution were still being discovered and understood. The study of natural history continued to evolve as a collection of several related sciences, but was generally understood to mean the study of plants and animals and their natural settings. The subset of natural history that studied living human beings had come to be called anthropology.

Then, as now, the same blurred lines existed between rigorous scientific discipline, education and entertainment. And a survey of natural history a century ago is not just a look at the science, it is also a journey into the mindset of the dominant cultural beliefs of the time.

For a longer exploration through 170 years of the culture of science, take an armchair cruise into the savage, untamed wilds of the deepest, darkest Archives of Scientific American at www.scientificamerican.com/magazine/sa

Dan Schlenoff was a contributing editor at Scientific American and edited the 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column for one seventh of the magazine's history.

More by Dan Schlenoff
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Natural History, 1915 [Slide Show]” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102015-2mS0xU0BPuCT3syHsogRtC

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe