New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Natural Viral Enzymes Do Battle Against Drug-Resistant Bacteria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Increasingly many bacteria are becoming resistant to antibiotic treatment, presenting a serious public health threat. But new research reveals that these bacteria are often still vulnerable to natural enemies from within¿namely an enzyme manufactured by viruses, or bacteriophages, found inside the organisms. "These enzymes offer an alternative method for combating resistant pathogens," says Rockefeller University's Vincent Fischetti, lead investigator on the work described in today's issue of Science. "A nasal spray containing this enzyme would prevent infections before they start. We would no longer have to wait for an infection to arise in order to treat it."

Unlike traditional antibiotics, which attack bacteria that have already infected some cell, the enzymes do battle with bugs on the surface of mucous membranes. When bacteriophages produce the compound inside bacteria, it punches holes in the organisms' cell walls, leading to their death. Fischetti and colleagues discovered that it had the same effect when applied from the outside. The team eliminated Streptococcus pneumoniae on the membranes between the back of the nose and throat in mice and showed that the enzyme could also kill penicillin-resistant strains of the pathogen in a test tube.

"This enzyme will kill pneumococci on mucous membranes within seconds," co-author Jutta Loeffler says. "By treating individuals carrying this bacterium with the enzyme, you could significantly reduce the reservoir of these bugs in the population and consequently reduce infection rates." The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ranks S. pneumoniae among the leading causes of illness and death in young children, those in poor heath and the elderly worldwide.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The enzyme therapy offers several significant advantages. It can be tailor-made for any bacterium, Fischetti notes, and thus should produce fewer side effects than antibiotics, which kill both good and bad bacteria in the body. In addition, it is unlikely to lead to resistance. The only downside is that the enzyme will probably not cure full-blown infections and so must be used on occasion in conjunction with antibiotics. Clinical trials are now in the planning stages

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe