Navy Recruits Wash Their Hands of Coughs and Colds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Among young adults in the military, the most common cause of lost time from duty is respiratory illness. It's a problem health officials have long tried to combat with everything from ultraviolet radiation and dust suppression to disinfectant vapors and antibiotics. For many years, an adenovirus vaccine was the weapon of choice. But manufacturers have discontinued its production. Now new research indicates that the best bet may be enforcing a simple hand-washing regimen. According to a report in the August issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, navy recruits ordered to frequently wash their hands experienced a substantial reduction in respiratory ailments.

Margaret A. K. Ryan of the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego and her colleagues assessed a program dubbed Operation Stop Cough, implemented at a recruit training command center in Illinois. As part of the program, commanding officers instructed recruits to wash their hands at least five times a day. To facilitate this task, the navy installed liquid-soap dispensers at all sinks and allowed wet sinks to pass inspection. In addition, drill instructors received monthly education from preventive medicine personnel on the importance of handwashing. The program proved effective. In comparison with weekly rates of illness among recruits during the year before Operation Stop Cough started, Ryan's team found 45 percent fewer cases of respiratory ailment during the two years after implementation.

Unfortunately, the time-constrained recruits had difficulty sticking to the washing schedule. But civilians might do well to follow it. Vaccine shortages present a problem not only to the military but to the general public as well. And though it's not a substitute for vaccines, hand washing is critical in preventing and controlling infectious disease, writes Joel C. Gaydos of the Defense Department's Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System in a commentary accompanying the report. "My impression is that in settings where visible soiling of hands is unusual, as in most offices, people are not inclined to wash their hands before eating," he notes. "Re-emphasizing handwashing in our daily lives may provide significant benefits with little effort or cost, especially during the respiratory disease season."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe