Neurological Insights

Biologists devise a memory on a chip and new ways to tackle Alzheimer's

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

How does a memory form? To demonstrate how this process occurs at the most basic level, biophysicists at Tel Aviv University replicated that event with neurons attached to a computer chip. Itay Baruchi and Eshel Ben-Jacob placed neurons from rat embryos on a chip surface and connected 64 electrodes to record activity. The researchers witnessed an identical pattern of nerve firings when chemical stimulants were dropped repeatedly at the same location on the chip. After some time, the neurons began to fire in the same way without chemical activation—the point at which they claim a memory becomes imprinted.

Understanding differences between the proteins made by normal and diseased brain tissues may provide a new approach to diagnostics. Richard D. Smith of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Desmond J. Smith of the University of California, Los Angeles, have created a complex system for analyzing proteins that combines advanced instrumentation with sophisticated image processing to inspect one-millimeter cubes of brain tissue from a pair of normal mice. The investigators determined the abundance of 1,028 proteins in the tissues. Future experiments will use this methodology to compare normal brain tissue with that afflicted by a neurodegenerative disease.

Better diagnostic techniques are needed, in particular, for Alzheimer's disease. Stina M. Tucker, Esther Oh and Juan C. Troncoso of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine demonstrated a test using antibodies that bind to the amyloid-beta proteins that form damaging plaques in the brains of Alzheimer's patients. The antibodies adhered to proteins in an early stage of a disease that mimics Alzheimer's in genetically engineered mice. That finding might eventually lead to a test for humans that could be used along with drugs under development to avert the disease through preventive treatment.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Conceivably, that test could be combined with a treatment that uses phages—viruses that infect bacteria—to break up noxious plaque. Beka Solomon of Tel Aviv University showed preliminary proof of this idea by administering phages via a nasal spray to 100 mice genetically engineered to develop Alzheimer's-like plaques. After a year of treatment, the mice had 80 percent fewer plaques than untreated mice.

Gary Stix is the former senior editor of mind and brain topics at Scientific American.

More by Gary Stix
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Neurological Insights” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 (), p. 48
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-48b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe