Neutrinos Weigh in on Galactic Scale

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A team of astronomers has used a "galactic balance" to weigh the neutrino, placing the tightest upper bound yet--2.2 eV (about a quarter of a millionth of the mass of the electron)--on the tiny particle¿s mass.

Neutrino properties are notoriously difficult to measure because the particles are electrically neutral and interact only weakly with matter. But because the universe contains so many neutrinos, about 350 per cubic centimeter at the present time, even a very small shift in estimates for neutrino mass can have profound consequences for cosmology. "The clustering of matter in the universe depends directly on the total mass of neutrinos," explains team member Oystein Elagory of the University of Cambridge. "If we can measure the clustering we can therefore get a direct constraint on the neutrino mass."

Elagory and his colleagues used data from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey to look at how 160,000 galaxies are distributed in our local universe. Their findings show that neutrinos could account for at most one-eighth of dark matter needed by currently favored cosmological models. That means that the major source of the invisible mass in the universe remains unknown.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Meanwhile, results from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory have set a lower mass limit of 50meV for one type of neutrino. Now, with Elgaroy¿s result, scientists are coming closer than ever to pinning the elusive particle down. Elgaroy¿s work appears in a forthcoming issue of Physical Review Letters.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe