New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Neutrons for Land Mine Detection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: PNNL

Experts approximate that more than 110 million land mines--hidden disasters waiting to happen--are buried around the world in nearly 70 countries. And at the rate people are currently working to find and remove these threats, the United Nations' Landmine Database estimates the job will take another 1,100 years. Potential victims don't have that long to wait, and so researchers at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have come up with a new kind of land mine detector, the Timed Neutron Detector (right). The device, which the scientists say should prove easier to use and more affordable than current methods, was field-tested in September and will be presented by principal investigator Richard Craig on November 14 in Washington, D.C., at the international meeting of the American Nuclear Society and the European Nuclear Society.

The instrument uses neutrons to pick up on hydrogen used in casings and explosives found in both plastic and metal land mines. A neutron source, about the size of a pager, holds a small amount of californium-252. As the element decays, it emits neutrons, which electronics in the instrument then "time tag," noting when the fission occurred. The neutrons shoot out into the soil, where they lose energy if they interact with hydrogen in a mine. These less energetic, slow neutrons are reflected back toward the detector; nonradioactive helium-3 in low-pressure pipes collects them and emits electrons. By way of other circuitry, these electrons translate into the desired information: whether a land mine was encountered or not. The scientists say that a person operating the detector would not receive any more radiation than if they were on a cross-country flight.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe