New Alloy for Journal Boxes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The following is the substance of a patent granted to Thomas Forth, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the 1st of May, 1855 : — Take seven and a half (7J) pounds of pure copper and melt it in a crucible ; then gradually add, in small pieces, ninety-two and a half (92) pounds of zinc, which when all melted and the two metals thoroughly mixed, the alloy is to be run into molds for journal boxes. The claim for this composition is the alloy in the exact proportions stated, which is asserted to make a superior and cheap composition for journal boxes. The alloy is simply a brass with the zinc greatly preponderating, and half a pound added or taken from the proportions given, of course, obviates the patent. Having recently had quite a number of inquiries regarding the composition of " Babbitt metal," and presuming they come from new subscribers, we feel called upon to publish the recipe, although we have given it in a former volume : — Take 24 pounds of copper and melt it first in a crucible, then add gradually 24 parts of pure tin and eight of antimony. Great care must be exercised in adding the tin to the copper. This composition is rendered softer by the use of a greater quantity of tin. Many persons suppose that the above metallic alloy is the subject of a patent by Mr. Babbitt ; it never was patented. The patent was for lining iron journal boxes with soft metal.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 36This article was published with the title “New Alloy for Journal Boxes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 36 (), p. 288
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05151858-288

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe