New Alzheimer’s Therapy Approved in China, Delivering a Surprise but Raising Questions

The drug targets the connection between the brain and the microbiome

Chinese regulators have granted conditional approval to an Alzheimer’s drug that is derived from seaweed, potentially shaking up the field after years of clinical failures involving experimental therapies from major drug companies.

The announcement over the weekend has been met with caution as well as an eagerness from clinicians and others to see full data from the drug maker, Shanghai Green Valley Pharmaceuticals. The company said its drug, Oligomannate, improved cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s compared to placebo in a Phase 3 trial, with benefits seen in patients as early as week four and persisting throughout the 36 weeks of the trial. 

It has been almost two decades since any Alzheimer’s drug was approved. Oligomannate has received scant attention in the United States during its development. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although full data on the drug have not yet been made available, the conditional approval by regulators means Oligomannate, also known as GV-971, will on the market in China by the end of the year, Green Valley said. The company will have to submit additional research on the mechanism of the drug and its long-term safety and effectiveness to the country’s National Medical Products Administration, Reuters reported. Green Valley also said it would launch a global Phase 3 trial next year in hopes of filing for approval in other countries as well.

“It’s good to see that drug regulators in China are prioritizing emerging treatments for Alzheimer’s, but we do still need to see more evidence that this drug is safe and effective,” Carol Routledge, the director of research at Alzheimer’s Research UK, said in a statement. “For any potential drug to gain a stamp of approval by regulators in the UK, we’ll need to see larger trials in countries around the world to back up the evidence from China.”

Outside experts said they would want the full data to show exactly how cognitive function improved for patients on the drug versus those on placebo, and how meaningful that was in the patients’ lives.

Instead of being designed to sweep away protein buildups in the brain, as has been the case with dozens of other experimental Alzheimer’s treatments, Oligomannate was developed to modulate the connection between the brain and the bacterial communities in the gut known as the microbiome.

The connection between the microbiome and overall health is the subject of a relatively new and evolving field of research, with some scientists seeking to understand how bacteria can influence the emergence of disease, including Alzheimer’s. 

Maria Carrillo, the Alzheimer’s Association’s chief science officer, said the development of Oligomannate reflected how the field had expanded beyond drugs that targeted the accumulation of protein in the brain, which, she said, “is the first step necessary toward a combination approach to treat Alzheimer’s dementia and all dementia.”

For the next trial, which Green Valley said will include U.S. sites, Carrillo said she was curious to see how the drug fared in a more diverse population and that she hoped researchers would track patients for longer. Often, Phase 3 trials in Alzheimer’s last for twice as long as the nine-month trial Green Valley ran in China, she said.

And Dr. Joy Snider, a neurologist at Washington University in St. Louis, said she hoped the next trial would include more people than the roughly 800 enrolled in the earlier Phase 3 trial.

“We’re always excited to have a new potential treatment,” Snider said, “but I certainly would not prescribe it to my patients based on a single study or another country’s approval until we know more about it.”

In September, a group of Chinese scientists, including some from Green Valley, published a study in the journal Cell Research that outlined the connection in mice between an altered gut microbiome and the neuroinflammation that some researchers think contributes to Alzheimer’s. They reported that Oligomannate “suppresses” the bacterial imbalance in the mice’s guts and “harnesses neuroinflammation and reverses the cognition impairment.” They added that the results of the mouse study “suggest a novel strategy” for Alzheimer’s therapies “by remodeling the gut microbiota.” (Many experimental therapies have cured diseases in mice without ever demonstrating any benefit in people.)

The completed trial was not designed to demonstrate that the drug apparently worked through that mechanism, said Dr. Jeffrey Cummings of the Cleveland Clinic, who has been an adviser to Green Valley for about two years. But he said the upcoming global trial will try to show how the drug seems to affect cognition.

While many in the United States were caught off guard by the approval, Cummings said it should perhaps not be surprising that companies elsewhere are making advances in Alzheimer’s.

“We are in a period of global innovation that we’re not quite used to,” he said. “This is a global disease and a challenge to the health and dignity of the elderly around the world.”

Cummings noted that some details of the clinical trial were presented at a scientific conference in 2018. He added: “We need to be open to these ideas at the same time as we need to hold them to a thorough level of scrutiny.”

Researchers focused on Alzheimer’s disease have expanded their approaches after years of focus on the so-called amyloid hypothesis, which asserted that the accumulation of a protein called beta amyloid in plaques in the brain caused the disease. Trials of drugs that cleared away those plaques have regularly failed to lead to any cognitive improvements in patients.

Last month, however, the drug maker Biogen announced that it was going to try to get Food and Drug Administration approval for an amyloid-clearing drug called aducanumab that it had previously said had failed in two trials. The company said a new analysis of some of the trial data showed a reduction in cognitive decline among some patients with early Alzheimer’s.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on November 4 2019

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe