New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A New Brain-Machine Interface May Help the Paralyzed Spell

Brain-machine devices help the paralyzed communicate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers are developing new ways to help the paralyzed communicate with their thoughts alone. Many of the new techniques rely on computers that analyze patients' brain activity and translate it into letters or other symbols. In a study published online in June in Current Biology, Bettina Sorger of Maastricht University in the Netherlands and her colleagues taught six healthy adults to answer questions by selecting letters on a computer screen with their thoughts.

While lying inside a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner, which measures changes in blood flow in the brain, volunteers stared at a screen displaying a table containing the 26 letters of the alphabet and a space bar. Each of three rows of letters was paired with one of three mental tasks: a motor imagery task, such as tracing flowers in one's mind; a mental calculation task; and an inner speech task, during which patients silently recited a poem or prayer. Different blocks of letters were highlighted on the screen at different times. To choose a particular letter, participants waited for the screen to highlight that letter and performed the mental task associated with that letter's row for as long as the letter was selected. The computer program, which could not read the volunteers' thoughts but could distinguish among the different kinds of brain activity, achieved an 82 percent accuracy rate.

Although Sorger's study is only a proof of concept, the new program is a promising complement to a growing collection of similar technologies. Niels Birbaumer of the University of Tübingen in Germany has created a “thought translation device” that allows paralyzed patients to spell words and choose pictograms using electroencephalography—a net of electrodes placed on the scalp. John Donoghue of Brown University and his colleagues taught one paralyzed man to open e-mail and play Pong by moving a cursor with his mind.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have also created brain-computer interfaces that allow paralyzed patients to type one or two words a minute on a screen with their thoughts as well as devices that convert thoughts into vowel sounds spoken by a voice synthesizer. One advantage of Sorger's device is that it would work for patients whose skulls are severely damaged. “Even if one person benefits, I would be very happy,” she says.

Ferris Jabr is a contributing writer for Scientific American. He has also written for the New York Times Magazine, the New Yorker and Outside.

More by Ferris Jabr
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 3This article was published with the title “I Think, Therefore I Spell” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 3 (), p. 28
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0912-28b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe