New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Bubble Reaction Findings Make Fusion Claims Unlikely

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sonoluminescence, the process in which light is created when sound waves move through a liquid and cause bubbles to expand and collapse, was at the center of a contentious scientific debate earlier this year. A team of researchers reported that they had exploited the phenomenon to achieve nuclear fusion using a tabletop apparatus, an assertion that quickly met with skepticism. Now new research casts further doubt on those claims. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, scientists have directly measured the reaction rates inside a single bubble as it sonoluminesces and the findings suggest so-called bubble fusion is "most unlikely."

Yuri T. Didenko and Kenneth S. Suslick of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign studied single bubbles in water subjected to ultrasound and, for the first time, established an energy inventory for the collapsing spheres. The team calculated that most of the sonic energy is converted into mechanical energy, which creates motion in the liquid surrounding the bubble. Less than one millionth of the sound energy gets converted into light and one thousand times that amount powers chemical reactions occurring within the sacs. Specifically, the scientists measured the yields of hydroxyl radicals and nitrite ions produced by the so-called acoustic cavitation of the bubbles. Because energy is required to power these chemical transformations, there is less available to raise the temperatures inside the bubble to the intensity required for nuclear fusion to occur. "Some researchers have suggested that conditions within a cavitating bubble might be hot enough and have high enough pressure to generate nuclear fusion," Suslick says. "But we've shown that chemistry occurs within a collapsing bubble, and that it limits the energy available during the cavitation." He adds, however, that bubbles in certain liquids, such as molten salts or liquid metals, could conceivably reach the sky-high temperatures required for fusion to occur and the possibility of sonofusion "cannot be ruled out at this time."

In an accompanying commentary, Detlef Lohse of the University of Twente in the Netherlands writes that "although fusion may be out of reach, there are other uses for sonoluminescent bubbles." In particular, he notes that because the temperatures within the bubbles approximate those on the surface of the sun and the pressures are as high as those near the bottom of the ocean, the bubbles could be used as controlled high-temperature reaction chambers to study reaction rates under extreme conditions.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe