New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Class of Anticlotting Drug Passes Preliminary Clinical Trial

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At the annual meeting of the European Society of Cardiology today, scientists from the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) are announcing promising results from a small Phase I trial of a new type of drug to prevent blood clots. Many current anticoagulants act on a clotting factor called thrombin. But the new drug, dubbed DX-9065a, acts earlier in the chain of biochemical events that lead to clot formation in the body. DX-9065a inhibits the action of Factor Xa, which itself normally converts prothrombin in the blood into thrombin. "Because of its location in the cascade, Factor Xa has long been seen as an attractive target for anticoagulation therapy," DCRI senior cardiologist Christopher Dyke says. The researchers hope the drug may present fewer complications than current treatments.

Unlike most Phase I trials, which test a drug's safety on healthy volunteers, this trial looked at DX-9065a's effects in 73 patients with clinically stable coronary artery disease at 10 U.S. academic medical centers. The subjects were 63 years old, on average. Some 68 percent had had a prior heart attack, and 86 percent had undergone either angioplasty or a coronary artery bypass surgery. Over the course of the study, they received a placebo or one of four different doses of DX-9065a. "We found no statistically significant difference in bleeding complications among all five groups," Dyke says. "Also, there were no adverse changes in kidney or liver function, and the hemoglobin and platelet counts remained stable across all groups."

The scientists are cautiously enthusiastic about these results. "This is truly the first experience in real patients who have coronary artery disease with a novel class of drug, so it is a pretty important step moving along our knowledge of anticoagulation therapy," DCRI's Robert Harrington notes. "Even if this proves to be a modest advance, modest steps forward in treating a disease that effects millions of people every year is pretty good. Larger trials will be required to give us the answer as to whether these are steps forward in reducing blood clotting while minimizing bleeding." To answer those questions, two Phase II trials are already underway.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe