New Clues to Ebola's Ferocious Ways

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With its mysterious outbreaks, gruesome symptoms and propensity for killing, few viruses elicit so much fear as Ebola. But new research may have brought scientists a step closer to developing a vaccine against the dreaded disease. Contrary to the belief of some scientists that Ebola¿s lethal effects stem from an ability to suppress the immune system, the new findings indicate that the virus does, in fact, provoke a strong immune response.

Researchers from the Centers of Disease Control and Emory University studied a mouse strain of Ebola that was adapted from a human strain. As early as four days after infection with the virus, they found, the mice exhibited high levels of activated CD4 and CD8 T cells¿key players in the immune system¿s counterattack force. The team also detected high levels of interferon gamma¿a protein produced by T cells that blocks the growth of viruses and renders cells resistant to viral infection. Several days later, however, the mice died. Thus, Ebola appears to work not by preventing an immune response altogether but by moving so swiftly that the T cells do not have time to multiply enough to mount an effective counterattack.

The team further showed that CD8 T cells are the major source of cytokines in response to acute Ebola infection. Moreover, in the absence of anti-Ebola antibodies, so-called memory CD8 T cells can apparently stave off infection. The researchers hope to understand the mechanism of this immune protection through further research.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe