New Device for "Tasting" DNA

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: D. DEAMER / UCSC

From diagnostic testing to molecular computing, scientists would like to have the means to distinguish between nearly identical strands of DNA. And in a report in this month's issue of Nature Biotechnology, researchers from the University of California at Santa Cruz describe a prototype device that might just offer a solution. David Deamer and his colleagues have developed a membrane containing a tiny pore that sucks in hundreds of single strands of DNA a second, analyzes them and then spits them back out¿as if "tasting the solution," Deamer says.

The nanopore is in fact an alpha-hemolysin ion channel, a kind of toxin that Staphylococcus bacteria use to punch holes in cell membranes. At its mouth, the pore is about 2.5 nanometers wide¿just wide enough for a double-stranded DNA molecule to enter (top image). Farther in, however, the channel narrows to less than 2 nanometers so that only single strands pulled from the double strand can continue on through (bottom image).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The negatively charged DNA molecules are sucked into the pore in the first place by an ionic current, generated by applying voltage across the membrane. In the experiment, the scientists used synthetic DNA molecules, folded in two like hairpins. They further used machine learning methods to train a program to recognize signals from these different but similar DNA molecules. Deamer notes that with a few modifications, the detector might help in rapid DNA sequencing or in detecting so-called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). "But the best application," his colleague Mark Akeson adds, "may be entirely unforeseen by any of us."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe